ArgueWikiWhere Arguments Live Forever

Argument statements

1. 2

   Sexualized lolicon art depicts only fictional, stylized characters and provides no evidence of pedophilic attraction to real children.
2. 0

   Attraction to lolis is unrelated to attraction to children.
3. 0

   Loli characters are cutesy moe caricatures.
4. ARGUING FOR:

   2

   Loli characters are fictional caricatures and not inherently sexual beings or stand-ins for real children.